Quote:
Originally Posted by guss76
wait why would u say that. For comparison look at this.
Anthony uses a FPGreen Evo 9 turbo with autronic engine management computer with cams etc. and runs what on race fuel??? Plus the evo 6 is a much lighter car. Now as much as we like to say that they are alot of evo 7 to 9's in the 10's on FPGreen evo 9 turbos frankly it's not that many.
I think for the car to run that time with the list of parts and also the weight of the evo Xs it is impressive even if it was on race fuel (now I don't know if it was, but it does not matter) The cars are responding well to simple bolt ons even more so than the all powerful evo9. It's only a matter of time before the other BIG GUNS in the evo world start breaking down the 10 sec barrier and who knows maybe by the end of the year even a 9 sec buy one of them.
Just wait until they start adding big turbos and built engines 
|
Well Anthony ran 11.6 on race fuel I think and that was with a 1.9 60 ft. But that was before we spent more time on the race fuel map. I think he would probably run in the 10's now based on the changes we made to the race map since then.
Cams will give you 20 hp atw or so. What is that worth in the 1/4?
Look it's a decent result... but I would bet that getting a fp green stock cam 9 to 11's on race is not a huge deal. It's decent but not amazing.
I mean the amazing times for stock turbo are high 10's and low 11's.
Then for stock frame turbos it's mid 10's and high 10's.
But I hear you.. for sure the X's are responding well for the mods. And perhaps I was being a bit demanding. On pump fuel there are stock turbo IX's that I think run high 11's. So if this was on race, hmm, I dunno.